Re: Clang c++ include path

[Mathieu Othacehe]

Hello David,

> I actually have two ways of fixing it though and am unsure which is
> more appropriate. The non-controversial one is to just get the
> libstdc++ header directory for the default gcc and patch clang to look
> there. However, as an end user of the clang package I would rather have
> a make-clang-toolchain procedure that takes a gcc-toolchain version and
> gets the standard library from that. I've got implementations of both
> of these, does anyone have an opinion which one would be preferred?

At first glace, the second option seems better but don't hesitate to
post both versions and we'll discuss them :)

Thanks,

Mathieu