[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: qtwenengine anybody?
From: |
Marius Bakke |
Subject: |
Re: qtwenengine anybody? |
Date: |
Mon, 06 Jan 2020 20:23:52 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Notmuch/0.29.3 (https://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/26.3 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) |
Ricardo Wurmus <address@hidden> writes:
> Hi Mike,
>
> thank you for your patient reply.
>
>> Ricardo Wurmus <address@hidden> writes:
>>
>>> Does the code include DRM support, for example? Does it phone home?
>>> Can we see the patches that upstream applied to the Chromium sources?
>>>
>>
>> QtWebengine does not handle DRM at all. That is handled by a 3rd party
>> plugin called wildevine and would require guix to bundle that plugin.
>> Something I'm confident is not going to happen. As an added measure my
>> proposed qtwebengine declaration has pepper plugins disabled making it
>> impossible to load 3rd party plugins either way.
>>
>> see https://doc.qt.io/qt-5/qtwebengine-features.html#html5-drm
>> for reference
>
> I’m aware of this. My apologies for not expressing myself more
> clearly. We probably want to remove the support for the DRM plugin,
> following the discussions about ungoogled-chromium at
>
> https://issues.guix.gnu.org/issue/34565
I have attached a patch that disables support for loading the Widevine
plugin, and also removes unused bundled software from the source based
on a whitelist, similar to ungoogled-chromium's
%PRESERVED-THIRD-PARTY-FILES.
It removes some 300+ MiB from the uncompressed sources. The snippet
will require some adjustments for every new version of QtWebEngine
however, I can help out with that when required.
Patch 1/2 is a slightly "cleaned up" version of Mike's latest patch,
fixing some cosmetic issues, and makes it respect the daemons requested
number of build cores.
With these changes, I think the package is ready to go. \o/
0001-gnu-Add-qtwebengine.patch
Description: Text Data
0002-gnu-qtwebengine-Purge-unused-bundled-software-from-t.patch
Description: Text Data
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
- Re: qtwenengine anybody?, (continued)
- Re: qtwenengine anybody?, Hartmut Goebel, 2020/01/02
- Re: qtwenengine anybody?, mike . rosset, 2020/01/02
- Re: qtwenengine anybody?, Hartmut Goebel, 2020/01/03
- Re: qtwenengine anybody?, mike . rosset, 2020/01/05
- Re: qtwenengine anybody?, Hartmut Goebel, 2020/01/05
- Re: qtwenengine anybody?, Ricardo Wurmus, 2020/01/01
- Re: qtwenengine anybody?, Pierre Neidhardt, 2020/01/02
- Re: qtwenengine anybody?, mike . rosset, 2020/01/05
- Re: qtwenengine anybody?, Ricardo Wurmus, 2020/01/05
- Re: qtwenengine anybody?, mike . rosset, 2020/01/06
- Re: qtwenengine anybody?,
Marius Bakke <=
- Re: qtwenengine anybody?, mike . rosset, 2020/01/06
- Re: qtwenengine anybody?, Hartmut Goebel, 2020/01/07
- Re: qtwenengine anybody?, mike . rosset, 2020/01/07
- Re: qtwenengine anybody?, Marius Bakke, 2020/01/11
- Re: qtwenengine anybody?, Pierre Neidhardt, 2020/01/11
- Re: qtwenengine anybody?, Mike Rosset, 2020/01/11
- Re: qtwenengine anybody?, Pierre Neidhardt, 2020/01/11
- Re: qtwenengine anybody?, Mike Rosset, 2020/01/13
- Re: qtwenengine anybody?, Pierre Neidhardt, 2020/01/13
- Re: qtwenengine anybody?, Mike Rosset, 2020/01/13