[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Parameterized packages
From: |
Pierre Neidhardt |
Subject: |
Re: Parameterized packages |
Date: |
Wed, 15 Jan 2020 12:44:01 +0100 |
Ludovic Courtès <address@hidden> writes:
> That’s another good example of a problem that would arise. :-/
> It doesn’t seem reasonable to me to add complex logic in (guix packages)
> to deal with this issue; I would very much prefer to leave input
> handling unchanged.
To be clear, what do you mean with "input handling"?
--
Pierre Neidhardt
https://ambrevar.xyz/
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
- Re: Parameterized packages, (continued)
- Re: Parameterized packages, Pierre Neidhardt, 2020/01/27
- Re: Parameterized packages, John Soo, 2020/01/25
- Re: Parameterized packages, Pierre Neidhardt, 2020/01/27
- Re: Parameterized packages, zimoun, 2020/01/20
- Re: Parameterized packages, Pierre Neidhardt, 2020/01/17
- Re: Parameterized packages, Pierre Neidhardt, 2020/01/15
Re: Parameterized packages,
Pierre Neidhardt <=