[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: MIPS support
|
From: |
Leo Famulari |
|
Subject: |
Re: MIPS support |
|
Date: |
Wed, 6 May 2020 14:23:27 -0400 |
On Wed, May 06, 2020 at 06:27:31PM +0200, Vincent Legoll wrote:
> From the manual or from the CI, to let the build farm do more useful things
> I'm not against, but is it really making maintenance difficult by still being
> in
> the codebase ?
It's not really a maintenance burden currently since we don't actually
build or maintain the Guix on MIPS at all.
I think this discussion is evidence that people find the situation a bit
confusing. When I am looking into a project, I find it demotivating to
read documentation about features that may or may not work — it's best
when the documentation accurately reflects what the software can do.
- Re: MIPS support, Ludovic Courtès, 2020/05/06
- Re: MIPS support, Vincent Legoll, 2020/05/06
- Re: MIPS support, Jack Hill, 2020/05/06
- Re: MIPS support, Christopher Baines, 2020/05/06
- Re: MIPS support,
Leo Famulari <=
- Re: MIPS support, Ludovic Courtès, 2020/05/17
- Re: MIPS support, Efraim Flashner, 2020/05/18
- Re: MIPS support, Ludovic Courtès, 2020/05/24
- Re: MIPS support, Efraim Flashner, 2020/05/25
- Re: MIPS support, Ludovic Courtès, 2020/05/25
- Re: MIPS support, Efraim Flashner, 2020/05/26
Re: MIPS support, Leo Famulari, 2020/05/06