[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Another misleading commit log (was Re: A "cosmetic changes" commit t
From: |
Ludovic Courtès |
Subject: |
Re: Another misleading commit log (was Re: A "cosmetic changes" commit that removes security fixes) |
Date: |
Mon, 26 Apr 2021 19:17:42 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) |
Hi Mark,
Mark H Weaver <mhw@netris.org> skribis:
> Léo Le Bouter <lle-bout@zaclys.net> writes:
>
>> On Thu, 2021-04-22 at 13:40 -0400, Mark H Weaver wrote:
>>> This commit was digitally signed and pushed to the 'wip-gnome' branch
>>> by
>>> Raghav, but it's also "Signed-off-by: Léo Le Bouter", so I'm not sure
>>> who bears primary responsibility for this one.
>>
>> It seems you are more focused and spend more time sending accusations
>> here than collaboratively working to improve GNU Guix. I don't feel
>> like that's something great to do at all.
>
> I feel an obligation to protect our users, and among other things that
> means calling attention to Guix committers that are doing things like
> pushing commits with misleading commit logs (which evade proper review)
> and pushing "cosmetic changes" that remove security fixes.
That you called attention on these issues is a great service to all of
us, Mark. But I have to agree with Ricardo: the harsh accusatory tone
towards Raghav and Léo was not warranted; please assume good faith.
Thanks,
Ludo’.
- Re: A "cosmetic changes" commit that removes security fixes, (continued)
- Re: A "cosmetic changes" commit that removes security fixes, Mark H Weaver, 2021/04/21
- Re: A "cosmetic changes" commit that removes security fixes, Mark H Weaver, 2021/04/22
- Another misleading commit log (was Re: A "cosmetic changes" commit that removes security fixes), Mark H Weaver, 2021/04/22
- Re: Another misleading commit log (was Re: A "cosmetic changes" commit that removes security fixes), Léo Le Bouter, 2021/04/22
- Re: Another misleading commit log (was Re: A "cosmetic changes" commit that removes security fixes), Ricardo Wurmus, 2021/04/22
- Re: Another misleading commit log (was Re: A "cosmetic changes" commit that removes security fixes), Mark H Weaver, 2021/04/22
- Re: Another misleading commit log (was Re: A "cosmetic changes" commit that removes security fixes),
Ludovic Courtès <=
- Criticisms of my "tone" (was Re: A "cosmetic changes" commit that removes security fixes), Mark H Weaver, 2021/04/28
- Re: Criticisms of my "tone" (was Re: A "cosmetic changes" commit that removes security fixes), Leo Famulari, 2021/04/28
- Re: Criticisms of my "tone" (was Re: A "cosmetic changes" commit that removes security fixes), Pjotr Prins, 2021/04/28
- Re: Criticisms of my "tone" (was Re: A "cosmetic changes" commit that removes security fixes), Joshua Branson, 2021/04/29
- Re: Criticisms of my "tone" (was Re: A "cosmetic changes" commit that removes security fixes), Léo Le Bouter, 2021/04/29
- Re: Criticisms of my "tone" (was Re: A "cosmetic changes" commit that removes security fixes), Matias Jose Seco Baccanelli, 2021/04/29
- Re: Criticisms of my "tone" (was Re: A "cosmetic changes" commit that removes security fixes), aviva, 2021/04/29
- Re: Another misleading commit log (was Re: A "cosmetic changes" commit that removes security fixes), Ludovic Courtès, 2021/04/22
- Re: A "cosmetic changes" commit that removes security fixes, Raghav Gururajan, 2021/04/22
- Re: A "cosmetic changes" commit that removes security fixes, Mark H Weaver, 2021/04/24