[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: substitute derivation: also substitute grafts?
From: |
Ricardo Wurmus |
Subject: |
Re: substitute derivation: also substitute grafts? |
Date: |
Sat, 01 Oct 2022 20:27:52 +0200 |
User-agent: |
mu4e 1.8.9; emacs 28.1 |
Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me@tobias.gr> writes:
> Quick note:
>
> On 1 October 2022 17:29:03 UTC, Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@elephly.net> wrote:
>>If substitutable was merely a hint that a daemon could be free to ignore
>>it wouldn’t be any worse than downloading a substitute vs building
>>something locally.
>
> Substitutability has legal implications in Guix, whether or not it
> shouldn't. Any 'suggestion' would have to be a third state. Just
> something to factor into the decision.
Yes, I was about to mention that.
In my scenario I have two machines, one building stuff the other only
substituting. The serving machine would be the one deciding whether to
enforce substitutability or not.
--
Ricardo
- Re: substitute derivation: also substitute grafts?, Ludovic Courtès, 2022/10/01
- Re: substitute derivation: also substitute grafts?, Ricardo Wurmus, 2022/10/01
- Re: substitute derivation: also substitute grafts?, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice, 2022/10/01
- Re: substitute derivation: also substitute grafts?,
Ricardo Wurmus <=
- Re: substitute derivation: also substitute grafts?, Ludovic Courtès, 2022/10/05
- Re: substitute derivation: also substitute grafts?, Ricardo Wurmus, 2022/10/05
- Re: substitute derivation: also substitute grafts?, zimoun, 2022/10/07
- Re: substitute derivation: also substitute grafts?, Mark H Weaver, 2022/10/07
- Re: substitute derivation: also substitute grafts?, Ludovic Courtès, 2022/10/10
- Re: substitute derivation: also substitute grafts?, zimoun, 2022/10/10
- Re: substitute derivation: also substitute grafts?, Ricardo Wurmus, 2022/10/10