Re: Merging core-updates?

[Kaelyn]

------- Original Message -------
On Tuesday, February 14th, 2023 at 8:29 PM, Kaelyn 
<kaelyn.alexi@protonmail.com> wrote:
> 
> ------- Original Message -------
> On Tuesday, February 14th, 2023 at 2:50 PM, Efraim Flashner 
> efraim@flashner.co.il wrote:
> 
> [snip]
> 
> > I ended up going a different route and moving xz from the finalize
> > packages to an actual xz-final and replacing xz-bootstrap/xz-mesboot in
> > %boot6-inputs.
> > 
> > I also tracked down the issue in tar and adjusted the testsuite so it
> > shouldn't be a problem on 32-bit systems.
> 
> 
> I just tried building wine-minimal from core-updates at commit da7d615629, 
> and I think you may have be missing a "!" with the new flag for the tar test 
> suite (i.e. it needs to be "-k '!tricky time stamps'"). Based on the build 
> log, right now only the failing test is being run:
> 
> ## ------------- ##
> ## Test results. ##
> ## ------------- ##
> 
> ERROR: 1 test was run,
> 1 failed unexpectedly.
> 
> ## ------------------------ ##
> ## Summary of the failures. ##
> ## ------------------------ ##
> Failed tests:
> GNU tar 1.34 test suite test groups:
> 
> NUM: FILE-NAME:LINE TEST-GROUP-NAME
> KEYWORDS
> 
> 151: time01.at:20 time: tricky time stamps
> time time01

I wanted to give a quick update: once I fixed the test exclusion for tar, I was 
successful in building wine-minimal on core-updates (which is 32-bit package on 
x86_64 as well).

> Cheers,
> Kaelyn
> 
> > --
> > Efraim Flashner efraim@flashner.co.il אפרים פלשנר
> > 
> > GPG key = A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D 14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351
> > Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted