[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Openjdk (was: Merging core-updates?)
From: |
Julien Lepiller |
Subject: |
Re: Openjdk (was: Merging core-updates?) |
Date: |
Thu, 16 Feb 2023 12:38:23 +0100 |
User-agent: |
K-9 Mail for Android |
Le 16 février 2023 12:03:35 GMT+01:00, Efraim Flashner <efraim@flashner.co.il>
a écrit :
>On Wed, Feb 15, 2023 at 08:19:08PM +0100, Andreas Enge wrote:
>
>> Is it necessary to keep all these version of openjdk and to bootstrap
>> version n with version n-1?
>
>Probably? I assume if you can cut some out that'd be ok. I'm pretty sure
>openjdk-11 and openjdk-17 are considered LTS by upstream so it would
>make sense to keep those specifically.
Upstream ensures openjdk N+1 can be built by openjdk N, but not necessarily
with N-1. We can try :)
Re: Merging core-updates?, Andreas Enge, 2023/02/13
- Re: Merging core-updates?, Efraim Flashner, 2023/02/13
- Re: Merging core-updates?, Andreas Enge, 2023/02/14
- Re: Merging core-updates?, Andreas Enge, 2023/02/15
- Re: Openjdk (was: Merging core-updates?), Andreas Enge, 2023/02/15
- Re: Openjdk (was: Merging core-updates?), Efraim Flashner, 2023/02/16
- Re: Openjdk (was: Merging core-updates?),
Julien Lepiller <=
- Re: Openjdk (was: Merging core-updates?), Andreas Enge, 2023/02/18
- Re: Openjdk (was: Merging core-updates?), Andreas Enge, 2023/02/17
- Re: Openjdk (was: Merging core-updates?), Andreas Enge, 2023/02/17
- Re: Openjdk (was: Merging core-updates?), Andreas Enge, 2023/02/17
- Re: Openjdk (was: Merging core-updates?), Kaelyn, 2023/02/17
- Re: Openjdk (was: Merging core-updates?), Andreas Enge, 2023/02/18
Re: Merging core-updates?, Maxime Devos, 2023/02/16
Re: Merging core-updates?, Andreas Enge, 2023/02/16
Ocaml (was: Merging core-updates?), Andreas Enge, 2023/02/18