[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: How can we decrease the cognitive overhead for contributors?
From: |
Ekaitz Zarraga |
Subject: |
Re: How can we decrease the cognitive overhead for contributors? |
Date: |
Sun, 03 Sep 2023 17:45:41 +0000 |
Hi,
> I think this is the biggest hurdle. A lot of folks are using gmail and
> its web based UI and it is just plain awful. I have made the switch to
> using neomutt (and isync + notmuch + mstmp) and it has made emails a joy
> to use and work with.
I use protonmail and they don't provide smtp access so I can't do git
send-mail as easy as other people do.
Protonmail has a bridge that deals with that but we don't have it packaged
because it's written in Go and it has TOO MANY dependencies.
This is not Guix's fault, but it's a problem Guix doesn't help fix either.
The only thing I can do with this is just copy-paste the result of git
format-patch and hope it's not a trouble for committers.
This doesn't mean I'm against the email based approach, in fact, I really
like it. The main problem I see is many people inside guix are not
sensible to people's problems and tastes.
Some people are forced to use tools for several reasons, too.
This is what I mean when I say many times emacs is kind of mandatory, and
this thread is kind of a demonstration of what I meant because the main
discussion evolved to: you can use this or that in emacs to ease the dev
experience.
I don't think software we use is the main problem, but the fact that we
are not always sensible with other people's experience.
Cheers,
Ekaitz
- Re: How can we decrease the cognitive overhead for contributors?, (continued)
- Re: How can we decrease the cognitive overhead for contributors?, MSavoritias, 2023/09/13
- Re: How can we decrease the cognitive overhead for contributors?, Ricardo Wurmus, 2023/09/02
- Re: How can we decrease the cognitive overhead for contributors?, Vagrant Cascadian, 2023/09/02
- Re: How can we decrease the cognitive overhead for contributors?, Ricardo Wurmus, 2023/09/04
- Re: How can we decrease the cognitive overhead for contributors?, Efraim Flashner, 2023/09/04
- Re: How can we decrease the cognitive overhead for contributors?, Maxim Cournoyer, 2023/09/04
- Replacing Mumi+Debbugs?, Ricardo Wurmus, 2023/09/05
- Re: How can we decrease the cognitive overhead for contributors?, Csepp, 2023/09/05
- Re: How can we decrease the cognitive overhead for contributors?, Wilko Meyer, 2023/09/05
Re: How can we decrease the cognitive overhead for contributors?, Imran Iqbal, 2023/09/03
- Re: How can we decrease the cognitive overhead for contributors?,
Ekaitz Zarraga <=
- Re: How can we decrease the cognitive overhead for contributors?, indieterminacy, 2023/09/03
- Re: How can we decrease the cognitive overhead for contributors?, Ekaitz Zarraga, 2023/09/03
- Re: How can we decrease the cognitive overhead for contributors?, Fannys, 2023/09/13
- Re: How can we decrease the cognitive overhead for contributors?, Maxim Cournoyer, 2023/09/13
- Re: How can we decrease the cognitive overhead for contributors?, Ekaitz Zarraga, 2023/09/13
- Re: How can we decrease the cognitive overhead for contributors?, MSavoritias, 2023/09/17
- Re: How can we decrease the cognitive overhead for contributors?, Simon Tournier, 2023/09/18
- contribute with content in our official help pages?, Giovanni Biscuolo, 2023/09/19
- The elephant in the room and the Guix Bang., Giovanni Biscuolo, 2023/09/19
- Re: The elephant in the room and the Guix Bang., Simon Tournier, 2023/09/20