[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: comparing commit-relation using Scheme+libgit2 vs shellout plumbing
From: |
Attila Lendvai |
Subject: |
Re: comparing commit-relation using Scheme+libgit2 vs shellout plumbing Git |
Date: |
Tue, 12 Sep 2023 11:07:31 +0000 |
is the decision between libgit2 and invoking git really such a big commitment?
let's make sure the entire guix codebase uses a single git related API, and
then we can easily switch back and forth between the two.
on another note, i'm surprised that the reference implementation of git itself
doesn't have a lib, and libgit2 even had to be written. even this may change in
the future.
--
• attila lendvai
• PGP: 963F 5D5F 45C7 DFCD 0A39
--
“I learned long ago, never to wrestle with a pig. You get dirty, and besides,
the pig likes it.”
— George Bernard Shaw (1856–1950)
Re: hard dependency on Git? (was bug#65866: [PATCH 0/8] Add built-in builder for Git checkouts), Simon Tournier, 2023/09/11
Re: hard dependency on Git? (was bug#65866: [PATCH 0/8] Add built-in builder for Git checkouts), Maxim Cournoyer, 2023/09/11
Re: hard dependency on Git? (was bug#65866: [PATCH 0/8] Add built-in builder for Git checkouts), Ludovic Courtès, 2023/09/14