[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


From: Brendan Tildesley
Subject: [bug#43249]
Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2020 23:38:25 +1000

On 8/9/20 10:22 pm, Prafulla Giri wrote:
I see.

Yes, it does make sense now why you chose to replace the 'wrap phase.

I wonder.... perhaps it'd be better altogether if the (wrap-program) procedure could be re-written to not make ..*.real.real programs...? That would save us a lot of code-duplication...

Actually there is such a thing that can be use for scripts. It's wrap-script. I had sort of forgotten about it because I believe it has a bug where it passes command line arguments incorrectly, so wasn't using it: . Would be worth looking in to again.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]