[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


From: Ricardo Wurmus
Subject: [bug#43249]
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2020 10:38:55 +0200
User-agent: mu4e 1.4.13; emacs 27.1

Brendan Tildesley <> writes:

> On 10/9/20 11:22 pm, Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
>> Brendan Tildesley <> writes:
>>> I guess then we should patch wrap-program to add
>>> (when (wrapper? prog)
>>>      (error (string-append prog " is a wrapper. Refusing to wrap.")))
>> Should it really refuse to wrap or *add* its variables to the existing
>> wrapper?
> If there is a /bin/foo and /bin/.foo-real created by wrap-program, and
> we are to run another wrap-program phase, under what circumstances
> would it /not/ be a mistake to call (wrap-program "/bin/.foo-real")
> instead of (wrap-program "/bin/foo")? And if the first one was called,
> probably it was because find-files was used and the packager didn't
> realise it was happening, and therefore it will be double-wrapped,
> like gedit is.

Oh, yes, that would be a mistake.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]