[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[bug#43249]
From: |
Brendan Tildesley |
Subject: |
[bug#43249] |
Date: |
Fri, 11 Sep 2020 18:18:21 +1000 |
On 10/9/20 11:22 pm, Ricardo Wurmus
wrote:
Brendan Tildesley <mail@brendan.scot> writes:
I guess then we should patch wrap-program to add
(when (wrapper? prog)
(error (string-append prog " is a wrapper. Refusing to wrap.")))
Should it really refuse to wrap or *add* its variables to the existing
wrapper?
If there is a /bin/foo and /bin/.foo-real created by
wrap-program, and we are to run another wrap-program phase, under
what circumstances would it not be a mistake to call
(wrap-program "/bin/.foo-real") instead of (wrap-program
"/bin/foo")? And if the first one was called, probably it was
because find-files was used and the packager didn't realise it was
happening, and therefore it will be double-wrapped, like gedit is.
- [bug#43249] Resolve Calibre run-time dependency, Prafulla Giri, 2020/09/06
- [bug#43249], Prafulla Giri, 2020/09/08
- [bug#43249], Brendan Tildesley, 2020/09/08
- [bug#43249], Ricardo Wurmus, 2020/09/08
- [bug#43249], Brendan Tildesley, 2020/09/10
- [bug#43249], Ricardo Wurmus, 2020/09/10
- [bug#43249],
Brendan Tildesley <=
- [bug#43249], Ricardo Wurmus, 2020/09/11
- [bug#43249], Brendan Tildesley, 2020/09/12
- [bug#43249], Ricardo Wurmus, 2020/09/12
[bug#43249], Brendan Tildesley, 2020/09/13