[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[bug#57133] [PATCH] gnu: Add rizin.

From: Maxime Devos
Subject: [bug#57133] [PATCH] gnu: Add rizin.
Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2022 21:07:18 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.12.0

On 11-08-2022 08:37, iyzsong--- via Guix-patches via wrote:
+               #$(origin
+                   (method git-fetch)
+                   (uri (git-reference
+                         (url"";)
+                         (commit "7d0c31ac7711de9c4d37f5047200dc5a407ff713")))
+                   (sha256
+                    (base32
+                     "00cmc7pws9m4hcm0bpdjm6n4agl5mqgczc4ccswfhywyzzvr7sqh")))
+               "test/bins")))

What's the license for those binaries? I doubt all of them are gpl3+.

I'm seeing a copy of in there. IIRC, it has a license of the GPL family, which requires providing the source, so we need the source code of it as well because of the licensing terms (the source code of that particular variant of libstdc++, which might differ from the version currently in Guix). Likewise for the other binaries.

Personally, I think it would be more practical to ignore rizin-testbins, even if that requires skipping some of the tests (hopefully not all of them).
+ ;; Most files are under LGPL-3.0-only, other are under: Apache-2.0,
+ ;; BSD-2-Clause, BSD-3-Clause, CC0-1.0, CC-BY-SA-4.0, GPL-1.0-or-later,
+ ;; GPL-2.0-only, GPL-2.0-or-later, GPL-3.0-or-later, LGPL-2.0-or-later,
+ ;; LGPL-2.1-only, LGPL-2.1-or-later, LGPL-3.0-only, MIT, NCSA.
+ (license license:gpl3+)))

You can put multiple licenses in the license field, using (license (list this that foo bar ...)).


Attachment: OpenPGP_0x49E3EE22191725EE.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]