[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[bug#61255] [PATCH 0/5] Add support for the RPM format to "guix pack"
From: |
Ludovic Courtès |
Subject: |
[bug#61255] [PATCH 0/5] Add support for the RPM format to "guix pack" |
Date: |
Sun, 12 Feb 2023 19:20:04 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.2 (gnu/linux) |
Hi,
Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer@gmail.com> skribis:
> * tests/pack.scm: Fix indentation.
[...]
> (check (gexp->derivation
> - "check-tarball"
> - (with-imported-modules '((guix build utils))
[...]
> + "check-tarball"
> + (with-imported-modules '((guix build utils))
I’m not convinced by the indentation rule for ‘gexp->derivation’ added
in 82daab42811a2e3c7684ebdf12af75ff0fa67b99: there’s no reason to treat
‘gexp->derivation’ differently from other procedures.
What about removing that rule from ‘.dir-locals.el’ and keeping
‘tests/pack.scm’ unchanged?
(Also not sure about the ‘computed-file’ rule. For all these things,
we’ll want to keep Emacs and (guix read-print) in sync, too.)
Thanks,
Ludo’.
- [bug#61255] [PATCH 0/5] Add support for the RPM format to "guix pack", Maxim Cournoyer, 2023/02/03
- [bug#61255] [PATCH 2/5] gexp: computed-file: Honor %guile-for-build., Maxim Cournoyer, 2023/02/03
- [bug#61255] [PATCH 2/5] gexp: computed-file: Honor %guile-for-build., Ludovic Courtès, 2023/02/03
- [bug#61255] [PATCH 2/5] gexp: computed-file: Honor %guile-for-build., Maxim Cournoyer, 2023/02/03
- [bug#61255] [PATCH 0/5] Add support for the RPM format to "guix pack", Ludovic Courtès, 2023/02/12
- [bug#61255] [PATCH 0/5] Add support for the RPM format to "guix pack", Maxim Cournoyer, 2023/02/16
- [bug#61255] (%guile-for-build) default in ‘computed-file’, Ludovic Courtès, 2023/02/23
- [bug#61255] (%guile-for-build) default in ‘computed-file’, Maxim Cournoyer, 2023/02/23
- [bug#61255] [PATCH 0/5] Add support for the RPM format to "guix pack", Ludovic Courtès, 2023/02/27