[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: doubt in char
From: |
Robert A. Macy |
Subject: |
Re: doubt in char |
Date: |
Wed, 10 Aug 2005 08:42:58 -0700 |
same here, "where" brings me to my next question...
I continually "step" on built in functions by accidentally
using their name as a quick write in variable name.
things like char, test, rand, and even abs, real, and imag
I stepped on, on occasion.
How do you avoid doing this? One could carry a very large
vocabulary of verboten names in their head, but in the heat
of writing and debugging script...
- Robert -
On Wed, 10 Aug 2005 09:20:45 -0500
Quentin Spencer <address@hidden> wrote:
> but "which char" (without the .m) on my version of Octave
> returns:
> char is a built-in function
>
> -Quentin
>
-------------------------------------------------------------
Octave is freely available under the terms of the GNU GPL.
Octave's home on the web: http://www.octave.org
How to fund new projects: http://www.octave.org/funding.html
Subscription information: http://www.octave.org/archive.html
-------------------------------------------------------------
- doubt in char, Jorge Barros de Abreu, 2005/08/09
- Re: doubt in char, Henry F. Mollet, 2005/08/09
- Re: doubt in char, Jorge Barros de Abreu, 2005/08/10
- Re: doubt in char, Robert A. Macy, 2005/08/10
- Re: doubt in char, Quentin Spencer, 2005/08/10
- Re: doubt in char, Robert A. Macy, 2005/08/10
- Re: doubt in char, Quentin Spencer, 2005/08/10
- Re: doubt in char, David Bateman, 2005/08/10
- Re: doubt in char, Jorge Barros de Abreu, 2005/08/10
- Re: doubt in char,
Robert A. Macy <=
- Re: doubt in char, Henry F. Mollet, 2005/08/10
- Re: doubt in char, Geordie McBain, 2005/08/10