[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [hfdb] Re: Grand Unified Hardware Database
From: |
James K. Lowden |
Subject: |
Re: [hfdb] Re: Grand Unified Hardware Database |
Date: |
Tue, 27 Jul 2004 01:15:36 -0400 |
On Tue, 27 Jul 2004, Zenaan Harkness <address@hidden> wrote:
> CVS storage of the database is certainly not a necessity. But a
> guarantee of data safety certainly is. If I have a copy of a backup of
> the database, I would be most comfortable if that data is in a human
> readable format.
>
> Naturally, the stored procedures and other constraints - the db schema -
> also needs to be part of the backup process.
Agreed.
--jkl
- [hfdb] Re: Grand Unified Hardware Database, (continued)
- Re: [hfdb] Re: Grand Unified Hardware Database, James K. Lowden, 2004/07/25
- Re: [hfdb] Re: Grand Unified Hardware Database, Zenaan Harkness, 2004/07/25
- Re: [hfdb] Re: Grand Unified Hardware Database, James K. Lowden, 2004/07/26
- Re: [hfdb] Re: Grand Unified Hardware Database, Zenaan Harkness, 2004/07/26
- Re: [hfdb] Re: Grand Unified Hardware Database, James K. Lowden, 2004/07/26
- Re: [hfdb] Re: Grand Unified Hardware Database, Zenaan Harkness, 2004/07/26
- Re: [hfdb] Re: Grand Unified Hardware Database,
James K. Lowden <=
[hfdb] Re: Grand Unified Hardware Database, Till Kamppeter, 2004/07/19