[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: gnumach release
From: |
Roland McGrath |
Subject: |
Re: gnumach release |
Date: |
Wed, 6 Mar 2002 19:43:36 -0500 (EST) |
> I think the only thing that came up when you mentioned it before was the
> upper limit on installed memory, but that newer happened anyway. I think
> there is a workaround available, and anyway fixing it for 2.0 (or later)
> will certainly be good enough for me.
Yeah, I think that is definitely too hairy a thing to tackle in the
moribund codebase.
> The bugs in the Debian BTS will not be fixed in gnumach (they are either too
> difficult to fix or not important). I see a lot of these items go with
> oskit version of GNU Mach, though.
37945 should be either closed or followed up. From that report, there is
nothing that says it is a kernel problem vs a Hurd problem.
42156 has I think been resolved with new GRUB features.
Is 45605 still a problem?
82600 seems like it was just a resource thing, and then there is some porn
spam in the report. :-) Can we close that one?
113732 should be trivial to fix, or it should be marked as punted.
- gnumach release, Roland McGrath, 2002/03/06
- Re: gnumach release, Marcus Brinkmann, 2002/03/06
- Re: gnumach release,
Roland McGrath <=
- Re: gnumach release, Marcus Brinkmann, 2002/03/06
- Re: gnumach release, Jeff Bailey, 2002/03/06
- Re: gnumach release, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/03/06