[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: No need for CC, please
From: |
olafBuddenhagen |
Subject: |
Re: No need for CC, please |
Date: |
Mon, 8 May 2006 18:08:37 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.11+cvs20060403 |
Hi,
On Wed, May 03, 2006 at 04:16:26AM -0400, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> Hm. You could drop mail that has address@hidden in the To: or Cc:
> header, but doesn't have a List-Id: header. That's the only way I can
> imagine right now (at least without constructing a more convoluted
> scenario); Mailman can't do anything for you, since you'll always get the
> direct reply from a third party, i.e. without any list headers, etc.
> (That's also why Olaf's suggestion in <address@hidden>
> won't work, if I understood it correctly.)
What suggestion?...
-antrik-
- Re: No need for CC, please, (continued)
- Re: No need for CC, please, Pierre THIERRY, 2006/05/02
- Re: No need for CC, please, Thomas Schwinge, 2006/05/02
- Re: No need for CC, please, Pierre THIERRY, 2006/05/02
- Re: No need for CC, please, Bas Wijnen, 2006/05/02
- Re: No need for CC, please, Pierre THIERRY, 2006/05/02
- Re: No need for CC, please, olafBuddenhagen, 2006/05/02
- Re: No need for CC, please, Pierre THIERRY, 2006/05/03
- Re: No need for CC, please, Bas Wijnen, 2006/05/03
- Re: No need for CC, please, Thomas Schwinge, 2006/05/03
- Re: No need for CC, please, Pierre THIERRY, 2006/05/03
- Re: No need for CC, please,
olafBuddenhagen <=
- Re: No need for CC, please, Thomas Schwinge, 2006/05/09
- Re: No need for CC, please, olafBuddenhagen, 2006/05/11
- Re: No need for CC, please, Bas Wijnen, 2006/05/11
- Re: No need for CC, please, olafBuddenhagen, 2006/05/13
- Re: No need for CC, please, olafBuddenhagen, 2006/05/02
Re: No need for CC, please, Pierre THIERRY, 2006/05/02
- Re: No need for CC, please, Marco Gerards, 2006/05/02
- Re: No need for CC, please, Pierre THIERRY, 2006/05/02
- Re: No need for CC, please, Bas Wijnen, 2006/05/02
- Re: No need for CC, please, Pierre THIERRY, 2006/05/03