[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Libcdio-devel] libdio 0.76cvs last call?
From: |
Nicolas Boullis |
Subject: |
Re: [Libcdio-devel] libdio 0.76cvs last call? |
Date: |
Fri, 23 Sep 2005 00:13:23 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.9i |
Hi,
On Wed, Sep 21, 2005 at 09:07:39PM -0400, R. Bernstein wrote:
>
> Okay. Thanks. I've removed the potential -lm linking then from the
> package.
I'm not sure this was right. As far as I know, the linking I added only
work for systems that support recursive dynamic linking or for
applications that use libtool and the provided .la files for their
linking.
In other cases, pkg-config becomes useful, and it should inform people
that they (may) need libm, so I think the -lm you added previously and
just removed was good.
> The tarbal and CVS have been updated. Check revision numbers. Will go
> through the test process yet again. And let me know if there are
> further questions or problems. Thanks.
I haven't been tracking libcdio for long, which makes it very complex to
track ABI changes. But I guess that everything should be alright if
you've been carefully following the guidelines...
Anyway, I still don't know if moving some declarations from paranoia.h
to cdda.h qualifies as changing the sourcecode. But considering that it
does is probably playing safe.
Cheers,
Nicolas
- [Libcdio-devel] libdio 0.76cvs last call?, R. Bernstein, 2005/09/18
- Message not available
- Re: [Libcdio-devel] libdio 0.76cvs last call?, R. Bernstein, 2005/09/18
- Re: [Libcdio-devel] libdio 0.76cvs last call?, Nicolas Boullis, 2005/09/19
- Re: [Libcdio-devel] libdio 0.76cvs last call?, R. Bernstein, 2005/09/19
- Message not available
- Re: [Libcdio-devel] libdio 0.76cvs last call?, R. Bernstein, 2005/09/20
- Re: [Libcdio-devel] libdio 0.76cvs last call?, Nicolas Boullis, 2005/09/21
- Re: [Libcdio-devel] libdio 0.76cvs last call?, R. Bernstein, 2005/09/21
- Re: [Libcdio-devel] libdio 0.76cvs last call?,
Nicolas Boullis <=