[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: file extensions

From: Graham Percival
Subject: Re: file extensions
Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2003 12:09:25 -0700

On Sun, 14 Sep 2003 13:34:46 +0200
Rune Zedeler <address@hidden> wrote:
> Wouldn't it be a good idea, before 2.0 to change the file extension
> convensions so that you could distinguish files to be compiled from
> files to be included?

The problem is that, AFAIK, there is no difference in the file format
between include-files and non-include files.  (apart from the lack
of a \score{} section in include files)

> It would be nice to be able to do something like "lilypond *.ly" without
> getting errors about include-files.

You can already do this with files names:


more ~/bin/pap
ly2dvi -P sc-*.ly
xdvi sc-*.dvi &

Whenever I want to compile scores, I go to that dir and type "pap".

- Graham

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]