[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
aiming at 2.2: dodecafonic staves
From: |
Heikki Johannes Junes |
Subject: |
aiming at 2.2: dodecafonic staves |
Date: |
Sun, 5 Oct 2003 04:21:58 +0300 (EEST) |
Now that 2.0 is out, one should think what to put in 2.2.
Modern music has a lot of possibilities, which basically give more freedom
to a composer to express their music. I'll present here the idea of a
dodecafonic stave which could be used instead of the diatonic stave.
I just figured out that in modern music the diatonic stave (seven pitches
for chromatic scale in a stave) is not adequate to represent always
dodecafonic music. For example, if you want to represent parallel clusters
(using the current notation), they will be glued together. Instead, a
chromatic stave (twelve pitches for chromatic scale in a stave) is adequate
to represent parallel clusters. The most intuive version of such scales is
the following:
As a diatonic stave, a cromatic stave would have five lines, starting from
c'':
c'' -O-
b' O
ais' -----O-----------------------------------
a' O
gis' ---------O-------------------------------
g O
fis' -------------O---------------------------
f' O
e' -----------------O-----------------------
dis' O
d' ---------------------O-------------------
cis' O
c' -O-
It is rather easy to implement, and chromatic marks are optional. The only
obscurity here is in the note naming: How should one call the note names so
that there would not be a conflict between cromatic marks and note names.
For example, `c + is' is marked with a chromatic mark but `cis' without.
Apparently, one has to
A) invent a set of new note names for such notation, such as:
- numbers: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
- alphabets: a b c d e f g h i j k l
- user-given: c h r o m a n t i z e d (different letters)
or B) use current note names and give the chromatic mark as an argument:
- the following will result to same notation: cisis d eses
- the following will result to chromatic marks: cis-is d es-es
Modern music has a lot of new notation, and many of them are good and
intuitive. For example, accelerando can be marked with increasing number
of bars (here only two notes are shown).
/|
-<-|
| \|
| |
| O
O
Here the problem is that what is the mathematical duration of such
construct. But anyway, the notation exist and is well known.
Greetings,
Heikki
- aiming at 2.2: dodecafonic staves,
Heikki Johannes Junes <=