[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Tremolo positioning
From: |
Joe Neeman |
Subject: |
Re: Tremolo positioning |
Date: |
Thu, 30 Mar 2006 22:55:46 +1100 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.8.3 |
On Thu, 30 Mar 2006 19:59, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
> > > I've just realised that I caused a regression for tremolos
> > >
> > > > on whole notes. I'll fix that today.
>
> And here a problem with \stemUp, using the CVS from today, 7:23 CEST.
Nothing to do with \stemUp, it's because you used \repeat "tremolo" instead of
g'4:32. I'm not quite sure how I caused a regression here, but here's a patch
anyway...
2006-03-30 Joe Neeman <address@hidden>
* lily/chord-tremolo-engraver.cc (acknowledge_stem): set the
stem-tremolo object in the stem (or else the stem might not be
long enough).
>
>
> Werner
>
>
> ======================================================================
>
> \relative c'' {
> \stemUp \repeat "tremolo" 8 g'32 s2. |
> }
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> lilypond-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
tremolo_20060330_2.patch
Description: Text Data
- Re: Tremolo positioning, (continued)
- Re: Tremolo positioning, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2006/03/28
- Re: Tremolo positioning, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2006/03/28
- Re: Tremolo positioning, Joe Neeman, 2006/03/29
- Re: Tremolo positioning, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2006/03/29
- Re: Tremolo positioning, Juergen Reuter, 2006/03/29
- Re: Tremolo positioning, Joe Neeman, 2006/03/29
- Re: Tremolo positioning, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2006/03/29
- Re: Tremolo positioning, Joe Neeman, 2006/03/30
- Re: Tremolo positioning, Werner LEMBERG, 2006/03/30
- Re: Tremolo positioning,
Joe Neeman <=
- Re: Tremolo positioning, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2006/03/30
- Re: Tremolo positioning, Joe Neeman, 2006/03/30