[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: fonts mangling
From: |
John Mandereau |
Subject: |
Re: fonts mangling |
Date: |
Sun, 20 Jan 2008 20:23:06 +0100 |
Werner LEMBERG wrote:
> Hmm. But the current master branch doesn't call mf2pt1 at all,
> AFAIK... Han-Wen hasn't merged yet his changes into the master
> branch, has he?
Yes, he has, and he made some other changes too; I played a bit with git
bisect, running "make clean && make" each time, and found that at least
one of these commits caused this font selection problem:
d855b626f5778137af77881672b21efe3f17bd1b Bugfix: uniq-list uses equal? iso. eq?.
6311cce5a6f2ba8ad59f1fa533953cb4c12c6cc4 Pfa vs. pfb fixes.
5c6a64bb795c80febcc6ce1ebcb7a25a862ebc30 Mf2pt1 fixes: run mf2pt1 in a temp dir
to fix filesystem pollution.
c8af5675d8b865905bad068598778269d71e3294 Change build system for mf2pt1 font
generation.
> Well, mf2pt1 only creates PFAs, nothing else.
Huh!? after compiling with current Git, I see a lot of .pfb files in
mf/out, but no .pfa; is it the source of the problem? With the old
build system with mftrace, .pfa files were generated too. When looking
at mf/GNUmakefile history, it looks like Han-Wen deliberately choosed to
generate .pfb iso .pfa.
> The wrong font selection is done elsewhere.
Yes, certainly. I can't help more on this, because I'm ignorant about
font selection, and I have no time to learn and investigate.
Cheers,
John
- fonts mangling, John Mandereau, 2008/01/20
- Re: fonts mangling, Werner LEMBERG, 2008/01/20
- Re: fonts mangling, John Mandereau, 2008/01/20
- Re: fonts mangling, Werner LEMBERG, 2008/01/20
- Re: fonts mangling,
John Mandereau <=
- Re: fonts mangling, Werner LEMBERG, 2008/01/20
- Re: fonts mangling, Erlend Aasland, 2008/01/25
- Re: fonts mangling, Erlend Aasland, 2008/01/25
- Re: fonts mangling, Werner LEMBERG, 2008/01/25
- Re: fonts mangling, Werner LEMBERG, 2008/01/25
- Re: fonts mangling, Wilbert Berendsen, 2008/01/26
Re: fonts mangling, Wilbert Berendsen, 2008/01/25