[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Make broken on master
From: |
Carl Sorensen |
Subject: |
Re: Make broken on master |
Date: |
Mon, 27 Jul 2009 09:01:53 -0600 |
On 7/27/09 8:15 AM, "John Mandereau" <address@hidden> wrote:
> Le lundi 27 juillet 2009 à 07:36 -0600, Carl Sorensen a écrit :
>> When I tried make, it got through rhythms.itely (which was were all the doc
>> changes I made were located). But it failed later on:
>
> Which upstream Git revision of the sources did you try to build? There
> are so much changes between recent revisions that it matters a lot.
Current master.
>
>
>> Compiling
>> /Users/Carl/lilypond-working/Documentation/out/notation/programming-interfac
>> e.texi...
>> /Users/Carl/lilypond-working/Documentation/out/notation/programming-interfac
>> e.texi is up to date.
>> Processing include: identifiers.tely
>> lilypond-book.py: error: file not found: identifiers.tely
>
> Can you see in your log whether out-www/internals.tely has been built?
> There should be identifiers.tely in out-www.
I couldn't find a log. Perhaps I was looking for the wrong filename.
There is a Documentation/user/out-www/identifiers.tely.
There is a Documentation/user/out/identifiers.tely
Those are the only identifiers.tely files in my source tree.
>
> At next failure, don't fear flooding my private mailbox with full (maybe
> compressed) logs, Gmail can bear it. This will prevent us from playing a
> time-consuming detective game.
OK, I can do that.
>
>
>> 1) Is there something I can do to fix this (i.e., is there a certain make
>> target I need to find)?
>
> Nothing besides cleaning up your working tree with whatever makefiles
> targets and "rm -rf foo" invocations are needed (make sure to save
> untracked but valuable stuff in obsolete directories first).
>
I've done make clean. Is there more?
>
>> 2) Do I dare push my autobeaming patch without having a successful make?
>
> I'm not sure, but I pushed some revisions that didn't build or dist
> well, so I'm not in a position to answer this question :-)
>
I'm on vacation this week, and won't be able to clean up any messes I would
cause, so I'll push next Saturday.
Carl
- Make broken on master, Carl Sorensen, 2009/07/27
- Re: Make broken on master, John Mandereau, 2009/07/27
- Re: Make broken on master,
Carl Sorensen <=
- Re: Make broken on master, John Mandereau, 2009/07/27
- Re: Make broken on master, Graham Percival, 2009/07/27
- Re: Make broken on master, Francisco Vila, 2009/07/28
- Re: Make broken on master [fixed], John Mandereau, 2009/07/28
- Re: Make broken on master [fixed], Werner LEMBERG, 2009/07/29
- Re: Make broken on master [fixed], Francisco Vila, 2009/07/29
- Re: Make broken on master [fixed], Werner LEMBERG, 2009/07/29
- Re: Make broken on master [fixed], John Mandereau, 2009/07/29
- Re: Make broken on master [fixed], John Mandereau, 2009/07/29
- Re: Make broken on master [fixed], John Mandereau, 2009/07/29