[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: nice stockhausen excerpt
From: |
Graham Percival |
Subject: |
Re: nice stockhausen excerpt |
Date: |
Tue, 23 Feb 2010 15:15:40 +0000 |
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 2:49 PM, Hans Aberg <address@hidden> wrote:
> RMS says he thinks it is better using artificial examples, not risking a
> lawsuit when it is so easy to avoid and still have good results.
1) I don't care what RMS says.
2) We were *never* going to use a Stockhausen example in the lilypond
docs anyway.
3) This whole thread is stupid and pointless and stupid.
- Graham
- Re: nice stockhausen excerpt, (continued)
- Re: nice stockhausen excerpt, Hans Aberg, 2010/02/22
- Re: nice stockhausen excerpt, Graham Percival, 2010/02/22
- Re: nice stockhausen excerpt, Hans Aberg, 2010/02/22
- Re: nice stockhausen excerpt, Graham Percival, 2010/02/22
- Re: nice stockhausen excerpt, Reinhold Kainhofer, 2010/02/22
- Re: nice stockhausen excerpt, Hans Aberg, 2010/02/23
- Re: nice stockhausen excerpt, Hans Aberg, 2010/02/23
- Re: nice stockhausen excerpt, Bertalan Fodor (LilyPondTool), 2010/02/22
- Re: nice stockhausen excerpt, Graham Percival, 2010/02/22
Re: nice stockhausen excerpt, Hans Aberg, 2010/02/23
- Re: nice stockhausen excerpt,
Graham Percival <=
- Re: nice stockhausen excerpt, Valentin Villenave, 2010/02/23
- Re: nice stockhausen excerpt, Joseph Wakeling, 2010/02/23
- Re: nice stockhausen excerpt, Valentin Villenave, 2010/02/23
- Re: nice stockhausen excerpt, Joseph Wakeling, 2010/02/24
- Re: nice stockhausen excerpt, Arthur Reutenauer, 2010/02/24
- Re: nice stockhausen excerpt, Valentin Villenave, 2010/02/24
- Re: nice stockhausen excerpt, Joseph Wakeling, 2010/02/24
Re: nice stockhausen excerpt, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2010/02/24