[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: GOP-PROP 8: issue priorities (probable decision)

From: Carl Sorensen
Subject: Re: GOP-PROP 8: issue priorities (probable decision)
Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2011 12:58:08 -0600

On 8/10/11 10:46 AM, "Graham Percival" <address@hidden> wrote:

> I'm feeling pretty good about this one, with the exception of
> whether we should have a Type-ignorance or not.
> In case you're wondering: yes, I am serious proposing that we
> elminiate priorities completely, and this is not a joke.  Nobody
> has objected yet, but if you don't think this is a good idea,
> please speak up.
> ** Proposal summary
> Let¹s get rid of priorities. We will simply describe bugs in
> neutral terms; each contributor can search and interpret the
> results as he or she sees fit.
> We will make a ³Type-Critical²; a new stable release will only
> occur if there are 0 type-Critical issues.

It might be less work to only have 2 priorities:


Then we could continue to use the system as it exists now.

But I don't feel strongly enough about it to prevent prop 8 from passing.



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]