[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GOP-PROP 8: issue priorities (probable decision)
From: |
Keith OHara |
Subject: |
Re: GOP-PROP 8: issue priorities (probable decision) |
Date: |
Thu, 11 Aug 2011 04:59:02 +0000 (UTC) |
User-agent: |
Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/) |
Graham Percival <graham <at> percival-music.ca> writes:
> Type-critical:
>
You might want to split this into two:
regressions to the output of Lilypond, and
critical impediments to development
> * Type-ignorance: (fixme name?) it is not clear what the
> correct output should look like.
In a classification of Types, I'd drop this. It is not a type
of problem but rather a status of problem, and not something we
will likely want to sort under. We can look in the comments to
see if the desired behavior is clear before starting to program.
- GOP-PROP 8: issue priorities (probable decision), Graham Percival, 2011/08/10
- Re: GOP-PROP 8: issue priorities (probable decision), Carl Sorensen, 2011/08/10
- Re: GOP-PROP 8: issue priorities (probable decision), Colin Campbell, 2011/08/11
- Re: GOP-PROP 8: issue priorities (probable decision),
Keith OHara <=
- Re: GOP-PROP 8: issue priorities (probable decision), Graham Percival, 2011/08/11
- Re: GOP-PROP 8: issue priorities (probable decision), Trevor Daniels, 2011/08/11
- Re: GOP-PROP 8: issue priorities (probable decision), Keith OHara, 2011/08/11
- Re: GOP-PROP 8: issue priorities (probable decision), Graham Percival, 2011/08/11
- Re: GOP-PROP 8: issue priorities (probable decision), Trevor Daniels, 2011/08/13
- Re: GOP-PROP 8: issue priorities (probable decision), Graham Percival, 2011/08/16
- Re: GOP-PROP 8: issue priorities (probable decision), Janek WarchoĊ, 2011/08/22
Re: GOP-PROP 8: issue priorities (probable decision), Keith OHara, 2011/08/13