[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 2.15.12 regtest problems
From: |
Keith OHara |
Subject: |
Re: 2.15.12 regtest problems |
Date: |
Fri, 23 Sep 2011 04:38:33 +0000 (UTC) |
User-agent: |
Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/) |
Phil Holmes <email <at> philholmes.net> writes:
>
> There are 2 significant problems I've found with 2.15.12. The first is
> shown in the Les Nereides regtest - a fingering indication goes missing.
>
Confirming. The missing fingering indication is hidden under a note head
in the other voice. The change from Stem to Flag for 2.15.12 is necessary
to see the problem. I'll try to reduce to a minimal example but it will
take a while; there are lots of interacting overrides in that torture-test.
> The second is performance. On longer scores, 2.15.12 is _much_ slower.
Confirming. On average compilation takes 1.5 times as long as it did with
2.14.2, so not as bad as your factor of 2.
- 2.15.12 regtest problems, Phil Holmes, 2011/09/22
- Re: 2.15.12 regtest problems, David Kastrup, 2011/09/22
- Re: 2.15.12 regtest problems, Graham Percival, 2011/09/22
- Re: 2.15.12 regtest problems,
Keith OHara <=
- Re: 2.15.12 regtest problems, address@hidden, 2011/09/23
- Re: 2.15.12 regtest problems, Keith OHara, 2011/09/23
- Re: 2.15.12 regtest problems, address@hidden, 2011/09/23
- Re: 2.15.12 regtest problems, Graham Percival, 2011/09/23
- Re: 2.15.12 regtest problems, Keith OHara, 2011/09/23
- Re: 2.15.12 regtest problems, address@hidden, 2011/09/23
- Re: 2.15.12 regtest problems, Keith OHara, 2011/09/23
- Re: 2.15.12 regtest problems, address@hidden, 2011/09/23