[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Further work on reducing make doc output - GOP 9
From: |
Colin Campbell |
Subject: |
Re: Further work on reducing make doc output - GOP 9 |
Date: |
Sun, 15 Jan 2012 08:27:48 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:9.0) Gecko/20111229 Thunderbird/9.0 |
On 12-01-15 07:47 AM, Phil Holmes wrote:
<snipped>
OK - so I don't think anyone has looked at this. I think I've got 3
options: ask again here; make a patch from the test files I created,
make a new directory in my lilypond-git directory and put them up,
standalone, as a patch on Rietveld for review; or implement this
system on the make doc build system and put the patch for review. I'm
pretty much against the last one, owing to the chances of wasted
time. Could anyone advise on the first 2 options?
--
Phil Holmes
It would seem reasonable to develop the test against your local doc
build, then put up a patch on Rietveld for review, and possibly a
Tracker item, as I can't quickly find an open one which would cover
this. I suggest that because patches in the formal process seem to
have a better chance of review, although not a guarantee.
Regarding your scripts: can they be modified to accept a variable paper
size, for those of us outside the A4 realm?
Cheers,
Colin
--
I've learned that you shouldn't go through life with a catcher's mitt on both
hands.
You need to be able to throw something back.
-Maya Angelou, poet (1928- )