[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: for_UP_and_DOWN

From: Graham Percival
Subject: Re: for_UP_and_DOWN
Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2012 15:25:40 +0100
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)

On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 04:10:50PM +0200, Łukasz Czerwiński wrote:
> I've uploaded my patch without for_UP_and_DOWN, but now it's time to talk
> about this #define. I'd like to make a second patch that will introduce
> that, but there was no consensus.

ok, great!

> If you don't know, what I am talking about, take a quick look at:
> (lines
> 75-90).

tldr summary: we use these for direction loops:

for (UP_and_DOWN(d))
   { ... }
for (LEFT_and_RIGHT(d))
   { ... }

- Graham

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]