[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: for_UP_and_DOWN
From: |
Graham Percival |
Subject: |
Re: for_UP_and_DOWN |
Date: |
Sat, 14 Apr 2012 16:13:01 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 04:41:40PM +0200, Łukasz Czerwiński wrote:
> On 14 April 2012 16:25, Graham Percival <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> > tldr summary: we use these for direction loops:
oops, that should be "we propose that we use these direction
loops"
> > for (UP_and_DOWN(d))
> > { ... }
> > for (LEFT_and_RIGHT(d))
> > { ... }
>
> Ok, I'll do so.
Not yet. I just wanted to clarify what you were talking about,
since most people don't have the time to go trawling through
rietveld discussions. If something is difficult to understand,
the first instinct is just to ignore the discussion.
- Graham
- for_UP_and_DOWN, Łukasz Czerwiński, 2012/04/14
- Re: for_UP_and_DOWN, Graham Percival, 2012/04/14
- Re: for_UP_and_DOWN, Łukasz Czerwiński, 2012/04/14
- Re: for_UP_and_DOWN,
Graham Percival <=
- Re: for_UP_and_DOWN, David Kastrup, 2012/04/14
- Re: for_UP_and_DOWN, Graham Percival, 2012/04/14
- Re: for_UP_and_DOWN, Łukasz Czerwiński, 2012/04/15
- Re: for_UP_and_DOWN, David Kastrup, 2012/04/15
- Re: for_UP_and_DOWN, Łukasz Czerwiński, 2012/04/15
- Re: for_UP_and_DOWN, David Kastrup, 2012/04/15
- Re: for_UP_and_DOWN, Graham Percival, 2012/04/15
- Re: for_UP_and_DOWN, David Kastrup, 2012/04/15
- Re: for_UP_and_DOWN, Graham Percival, 2012/04/15
- Re: for_UP_and_DOWN, Łukasz Czerwiński, 2012/04/17