[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: for_UP_and_DOWN

From: David Kastrup
Subject: Re: for_UP_and_DOWN
Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2012 17:37:14 +0200
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.1.50 (gnu/linux)

Graham Percival <address@hidden> writes:

> On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 05:16:07PM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
>> Actually, with option -std=c++0x GCC would accept
>> for (Direction d : { UP, DOWN })
>> {
>>    ...
>> }
>> and that would be readable enough without having to revert to macros.
> I like that solution, but I'm iffy about relying on compiler
> support for elements of languages that are less than 10 years old.

I was not suggesting we use it.  I just pointed out that in future for
_some_ things "the C++ way" could become less incompatible with

David Kastrup

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]