[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Regarding LSR translation work

From: Phil Holmes
Subject: Re: Regarding LSR translation work
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 14:56:42 +0100

----- Original Message ----- From: "Graham Percival" <address@hidden>
To: "Phil Holmes" <address@hidden>
Cc: "Federico Bruni" <address@hidden>; <address@hidden>
Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2012 8:42 AM
Subject: Re: Regarding LSR translation work

[1] of course there was some recent interest in this.  But to put
some numbers on it: I was expecting ~3 contributors per year to do
serious work within LSR, and to have ~1 new LSR editor per year.
I think that over the lifetime of LSR (i.e. 7 years) we've had
about 5 contributors doing serious work and 2 or 3 editors.

I think you tend to see the LSR as a way of providing examples for the docs, which it does. However, it has a much more significant value as a searchable source of tweaks and inspiration. It's worth supporting for that alone.

Thomas and David are now supporting it with my help as git pusher, and I hope the upgrade to 2.16 will happen quite promptly.

Phil Holmes

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]