[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Lilypond-auto] Patchy email
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: [Lilypond-auto] Patchy email |
Date: |
Tue, 17 Jul 2012 22:33:54 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.1.50 (gnu/linux) |
David Kastrup <address@hidden> writes:
> Please _don't_ ever push a "fix" on top of a broken staging branch. We
> want to keep master compiling always. If your fix works, it means that
> Patchy will move both the broken commit as well as the fix to master.
>
> I've cleared both for now and hope that no Patchy has already picked the
> "fix" up. I'll investigate what to do here.
>
> It is not quite clear to me how the bug went through my tests, and why
> Patchy does not complain (apparently make doc does not compile the "new"
> snippets ?!?).
>
> So we already have one fishy commit in master, but at least it is "make
> doc" clean.
Pushed a fix to staging on top of master and cleared out your changes
(after moving them to a private branch so that they don't get lost).
Let's see what commit Patchy moves to master next, and go from there.
--
David Kastrup
- Patchy email, lilypond-auto, 2012/07/12
- Patchy email, lilypond-auto, 2012/07/17
- Re: [Lilypond-auto] Patchy email, John Mandereau, 2012/07/17
- Re: [Lilypond-auto] Patchy email, David Kastrup, 2012/07/17
- Re: [Lilypond-auto] Patchy email,
David Kastrup <=
- Re: [Lilypond-auto] Patchy email, David Kastrup, 2012/07/17
- Re: [Lilypond-auto] Patchy email, David Kastrup, 2012/07/17
- Re: [Lilypond-auto] Patchy email, John Mandereau, 2012/07/17
- Re: [Lilypond-auto] Patchy email, David Kastrup, 2012/07/18
- Re: [Lilypond-auto] Patchy email, John Mandereau, 2012/07/18
- Re: [Lilypond-auto] Patchy email, David Kastrup, 2012/07/18
- Re: [Lilypond-auto] Patchy email, Graham Percival, 2012/07/18
- Re: [Lilypond-auto] Patchy email, David Kastrup, 2012/07/18
- Re: [Lilypond-auto] Patchy email, John Mandereau, 2012/07/17
Patchy email, lilypond-auto, 2012/07/25