[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: markup-commands rest-by-number and rest (issue 6850073)
|
From: |
benko . pal |
|
Subject: |
Re: markup-commands rest-by-number and rest (issue 6850073) |
|
Date: |
Wed, 21 Nov 2012 08:05:09 +0000 |
http://codereview.appspot.com/6850073/diff/9001/scm/define-markup-commands.scm
File scm/define-markup-commands.scm (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/6850073/diff/9001/scm/define-markup-commands.scm#newcode3247
scm/define-markup-commands.scm:3247: "M"
there are no separate glyphs for rests and multi measure rests: the M in
glyph names stands not for MultiMeasure, but for Minus. that makes for
rewriting the cond below, I'm afraid, but it will be simpler.
http://codereview.appspot.com/6850073/
- markup-commands rest-by-number and rest (issue 6850073), thomasmorley65, 2012/11/18
- Re: markup-commands rest-by-number and rest (issue 6850073), lemzwerg, 2012/11/19
- Re: markup-commands rest-by-number and rest (issue 6850073), thomasmorley65, 2012/11/19
- Re: markup-commands rest-by-number and rest (issue 6850073), thomasmorley65, 2012/11/19
- Re: markup-commands rest-by-number and rest (issue 6850073),
benko . pal <=
- Re: markup-commands rest-by-number and rest (issue 6850073), thomasmorley65, 2012/11/25
- Re: markup-commands rest-by-number and rest (issue 6850073), benko . pal, 2012/11/26
- Re: markup-commands rest-by-number and rest (issue 6850073), dak, 2012/11/26
- Re: markup-commands rest-by-number and rest (issue 6850073), dak, 2012/11/26
- Re: markup-commands rest-by-number and rest (issue 6850073), benko . pal, 2012/11/26
- Re: markup-commands rest-by-number and rest (issue 6850073), thomasmorley65, 2012/11/26
- Re: markup-commands rest-by-number and rest (issue 6850073), benko . pal, 2012/11/27
- Re: markup-commands rest-by-number and rest (issue 6850073), thomasmorley65, 2012/11/28
- Re: markup-commands rest-by-number and rest (issue 6850073), benko . pal, 2012/11/29