Re: suggestion: change OctavateEight name to ClefTransposition - opinions?

[Janek Warchoł]

2013/4/7 Ian Hulin <address@hidden>:
>
>> I'd prefer ClefOctavation (or maybe ClefOctaveShift) to
>> ClefModifier because it's clearer / more intuitive (at least to
>> me).  ClefModifier could be misunderstood to refer to the shape of
>> the symbol.
>
> 1+
> The only numbers that make sense above or below clefs are ones
> referring to a whole number of octaves (8, 15 etc.)

I don't agree.  Personally, i think that transposing instruments could
use the non-octave modifiers to make their transposition clearer.
Anyway, since we allow non-octave modifications, it's better to
reflect that in the naming.

Janek