Re: Updates to NR sections 3 and 4 (issue 10782045)

[Phil Holmes]

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "David Kastrup" <address@hidden>
To: "Phil Holmes" <address@hidden>
Cc: <address@hidden>; <address@hidden>; 
<address@hidden>; <address@hidden>
Sent: Sunday, June 30, 2013 11:23 AM
Subject: Re: Updates to NR sections 3 and 4 (issue 10782045)


> "Phil Holmes" <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > ----- Original Message ----- 
> > From: <address@hidden>
> > To: <address@hidden>
> > Cc: <address@hidden>; <address@hidden>
> > Sent: Sunday, June 30, 2013 8:11 AM
> > Subject: Re: Updates to NR sections 3 and 4 (issue 10782045)
> >
> >
> > > Just one comment, otherwise LGTM
> > >
> > > Trevor
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > https://codereview.appspot.com/10782045/diff/1/Documentation/notation/input.itely
> > > File Documentation/notation/input.itely (right):
> > >
> > > https://codereview.appspot.com/10782045/diff/1/Documentation/notation/input.itely#newcode2198
> > > Documentation/notation/input.itely:2198: \relative c'' {
> > > No.  \relative must be applied to the music
> > > in a constant sequence, not to a sequence that
> > > might change depending on the tags.
> > >
> > > https://codereview.appspot.com/10782045/
> >
> >
> > I think it might actually be worth a comment to that effect with this
> > example?  "Note where the \relative statement is placed..."
>
> Don't think so.  Notation manual is a reference manual.  Information
> like that belongs to \relative.  It would be a different matter in the
> Learning Manual.


Seems relevant to tagging, too?

--
Phil Holmes