|Subject:||Re: Python 3 support|
|Date:||Tue, 18 Mar 2014 11:37:29 -0400|
Julien Rioux <address@hidden> writes:Who is "we"? I for one am not going to agree to GitHub's quite invasive
> The current hosting situation isn't bad that we need to take such
> important actions with savannah. With github, we already have hosting,
> a platform for contribution and review comments, and relatively strong
> visibility, at no effort from us.
usage conditions for their "free" offerings which include killing a
project for any reason they want to at any point of time, explicitly
citing bandwidth usage as one such reason.
Now the situation is in theory not all that different with Savannah.
Except that Savannah does not serve stockholders but its users and Free
Software. When they find that there is a technical problem in
connection with serving a project, "pull the plug" will be way lower in
the list of remedies than with GitHub.
|[Prev in Thread]||Current Thread||[Next in Thread]|