[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: thinking twice about the new issue tracker
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: thinking twice about the new issue tracker |
Date: |
Wed, 02 Sep 2015 12:46:39 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
"Trevor Daniels" <address@hidden> writes:
>> I made the bitbucket repository public:
>> https://bitbucket.org/fedelibre/lilyissues/issues?status=new&status=open
>
> I don't see how to set up searches; is that possible?
>
> And we'd be limited to 5 developers, unless we pay, it seems.
> Hardly opensource.
More like "hardly gratis". I've just glanced cursorily at the site but
saw no obvious advertisement of source code and/or self-hosting. Unless
I am mistaken, it is not "hardly opensource" but rather "not opensource
at all".
--
David Kastrup
- Re: thinking twice about the new issue tracker, (continued)
- Re: thinking twice about the new issue tracker, Federico Bruni, 2015/09/02
- Re: thinking twice about the new issue tracker, Federico Bruni, 2015/09/03
- Re: thinking twice about the new issue tracker, Trevor Daniels, 2015/09/03
- Re: thinking twice about the new issue tracker, David Kastrup, 2015/09/03
- Re: thinking twice about the new issue tracker, Federico Bruni, 2015/09/03
- Re: thinking twice about the new issue tracker, David Kastrup, 2015/09/03
- Re: thinking twice about the new issue tracker, Federico Bruni, 2015/09/03
- Re: thinking twice about the new issue tracker, Trevor Daniels, 2015/09/03
- Re: thinking twice about the new issue tracker, David Kastrup, 2015/09/03
- Re: thinking twice about the new issue tracker, Trevor Daniels, 2015/09/02
- Re: thinking twice about the new issue tracker,
David Kastrup <=
- Re: thinking twice about the new issue tracker, Trevor Daniels, 2015/09/02
Re: thinking twice about the new issue tracker, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2015/09/04