[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: guile-2.0 and debian
From: |
Antonio Ospite |
Subject: |
Re: guile-2.0 and debian |
Date: |
Wed, 7 Dec 2016 10:31:22 +0100 |
On Wed, 7 Dec 2016 08:42:29 +0100
Urs Liska <address@hidden> wrote:
> Am 07.11.2016 um 17:08 schrieb Federico Bruni:
> > In case you don't know already, last news about guile2 and debian:
> > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=746005#216
>
> Just for the record (although it's probably evident):
> This doesn't only mean one can't install "lilypond" from Debian testing
> but it's also not possible to do
>
> # apt-get build-dep lilypond
>
> So is there a way to get LilyPond's build-dependencies on that distro
> (either a list of dependencies to install manually or by pinning it to
> an older release?
>
Hi Urs,
I contacted the debian package maintainers again to see if they can
apply the changes dev/guile-v2-work and upload a package.
For the time being, you can still get the list of dependencies from
here:
https://anonscm.debian.org/git/collab-maint/lilypond.git/tree/debian/control?h=debian
And pass the list to apt-get.
Ciao,
Antonio
--
Antonio Ospite
https://ao2.it
https://twitter.com/ao2it
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian, (continued)
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian, Thomas Morley, 2016/12/05
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian, Urs Liska, 2016/12/07
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian, Federico Bruni, 2016/12/07
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian, Urs Liska, 2016/12/07
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian, Urs Liska, 2016/12/07
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian, Federico Bruni, 2016/12/07
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian, Urs Liska, 2016/12/07
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian, Federico Bruni, 2016/12/07
Re: guile-2.0 and debian,
Antonio Ospite <=
Re: guile-2.0 and debian, David Kastrup, 2016/12/07