[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Refactor get/set_property to take the item as first argument (issue
|
From: |
jonas . hahnfeld |
|
Subject: |
Re: Refactor get/set_property to take the item as first argument (issue 573670043 by address@hidden) |
|
Date: |
Fri, 24 Apr 2020 01:32:59 -0700 |
On 2020/04/24 08:15:09, Valentin Villenave wrote:
> On 2020/04/24 07:20:55, hahnjo wrote:
> > If there are no technical objections, I think we should move
> > forward and let something as big sit around for too long.
>
> Just for clarification, did you miss a "not" in that sentence?
Ehm yes. Probably past me couldn't decide where to put it...
If there are no technical objections, I think we should move
forward and not let something as big sit around for too long.
https://codereview.appspot.com/573670043/
Re: Refactor get/set_property to take the item as first argument (issue 573670043 by address@hidden), dak, 2020/04/12
Re: Refactor get/set_property to take the item as first argument (issue 573670043 by address@hidden), nine . fierce . ballads, 2020/04/13
Re: Refactor get/set_property to take the item as first argument (issue 573670043 by address@hidden), dak, 2020/04/13
Re: Refactor get/set_property to take the item as first argument (issue 573670043 by address@hidden), Carl . D . Sorensen, 2020/04/13
Re: Refactor get/set_property to take the item as first argument (issue 573670043 by address@hidden), jonas . hahnfeld, 2020/04/24
Re: Refactor get/set_property to take the item as first argument (issue 573670043 by address@hidden), v . villenave, 2020/04/24
Re: Refactor get/set_property to take the item as first argument (issue 573670043 by address@hidden),
jonas . hahnfeld <=