[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: xdvipdfmx fails with some regtests (“Invalid object”)
From: |
Jonas Hahnfeld |
Subject: |
Re: xdvipdfmx fails with some regtests (“Invalid object”) |
Date: |
Thu, 18 Jun 2020 21:16:07 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Evolution 3.36.3 |
Am Donnerstag, den 18.06.2020, 19:03 +0200 schrieb Jonas Hahnfeld via
Discussions on LilyPond development:
> I think the way forward for now is reverting above commit, even if I
> don't really like it. Unless somebody has a really clever idea how to
> 1) avoid GS producing a broken PDF (if that's the case), or
> 2) make xelatex accept the PDF produced by GS as described above.
Here's a merge request that reverts the commit and the follow-up fixes:
https://gitlab.com/lilypond/lilypond/-/merge_requests/176
To be clear: I'm not happy doing this, I very much liked Han-Wen's
idea. But breaking the documentation build on a pretty standard
configuration is not the outcome I had hoped for...
Jonas
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
- Re: xdvipdfmx fails with some regtests (“Invalid object”), (continued)
- Re: xdvipdfmx fails with some regtests (“Invalid object”), Jonas Hahnfeld, 2020/06/19
- Re: xdvipdfmx fails with some regtests (“Invalid object”), Jonas Hahnfeld, 2020/06/19
- Re: xdvipdfmx fails with some regtests (“Invalid object”), Jonas Hahnfeld, 2020/06/19
- Re: xdvipdfmx fails with some regtests (“Invalid object”), Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2020/06/19
- Re: xdvipdfmx fails with some regtests (“Invalid object”), Jonas Hahnfeld, 2020/06/19
- Re: xdvipdfmx fails with some regtests (“Invalid object”), Michael Käppler, 2020/06/20
- Re: xdvipdfmx fails with some regtests (“Invalid object”), David Kastrup, 2020/06/19
- Re: xdvipdfmx fails with some regtests (“Invalid object”), Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2020/06/19
- Re: xdvipdfmx fails with some regtests (“Invalid object”), David Kastrup, 2020/06/19
- Re: xdvipdfmx fails with some regtests (“Invalid object”), Jonas Hahnfeld, 2020/06/18
- Re: xdvipdfmx fails with some regtests (“Invalid object”),
Jonas Hahnfeld <=