[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: xdvipdfmx fails with some regtests (“Invalid object”)
From: |
Han-Wen Nienhuys |
Subject: |
Re: xdvipdfmx fails with some regtests (“Invalid object”) |
Date: |
Fri, 19 Jun 2020 15:40:49 +0200 |
On Fri, Jun 19, 2020 at 3:13 PM David Kastrup <dak@gnu.org> wrote:
>
> Han-Wen Nienhuys <hanwenn@gmail.com> writes:
>
> > On Fri, Jun 19, 2020 at 12:50 PM Jonas Hahnfeld <hahnjo@hahnjo.de> wrote:
> >> No changes for me. Please also keep in mind that the same command
> >> string works via the API interpreter. It could be that this is related
> >> to processing other files before the "empty" one...
> >> I'll try to write a small wrapper around the API so we can test outside
> >> of LilyPond what actually triggers the broken PDF.
> >
> > Your hunch is correct. No need to write a wrapper, the following in a
> > .ly file works if you replace SCM_UNDEFINED with SCM_UNSPECIFIED in
> > ly:gs-api
>
> return SCM_UNDEFINED; is _NOT_ good behavior for Scheme functions. I
> have no idea why it is done here.
Just an oversight I think. I missed it during review, as did you.
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys - hanwenn@gmail.com - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen
- Re: xdvipdfmx fails with some regtests (“Invalid object”), (continued)
- Re: xdvipdfmx fails with some regtests (“Invalid object”), Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2020/06/19
- Re: xdvipdfmx fails with some regtests (“Invalid object”), Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2020/06/19
- Re: xdvipdfmx fails with some regtests (“Invalid object”), Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2020/06/19
- Re: xdvipdfmx fails with some regtests (“Invalid object”), Jonas Hahnfeld, 2020/06/19
- Re: xdvipdfmx fails with some regtests (“Invalid object”), Jonas Hahnfeld, 2020/06/19
- Re: xdvipdfmx fails with some regtests (“Invalid object”), Jonas Hahnfeld, 2020/06/19
- Re: xdvipdfmx fails with some regtests (“Invalid object”), Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2020/06/19
- Re: xdvipdfmx fails with some regtests (“Invalid object”), Jonas Hahnfeld, 2020/06/19
- Re: xdvipdfmx fails with some regtests (“Invalid object”), Michael Käppler, 2020/06/20
- Re: xdvipdfmx fails with some regtests (“Invalid object”), David Kastrup, 2020/06/19
- Re: xdvipdfmx fails with some regtests (“Invalid object”),
Han-Wen Nienhuys <=
- Re: xdvipdfmx fails with some regtests (“Invalid object”), David Kastrup, 2020/06/19
- Re: xdvipdfmx fails with some regtests (“Invalid object”), Jonas Hahnfeld, 2020/06/18
- Re: xdvipdfmx fails with some regtests (“Invalid object”), Jonas Hahnfeld, 2020/06/18