|
From: | tisimst |
Subject: | Re: Changing voice order... |
Date: | Thu, 3 Nov 2016 09:49:27 -0700 (MST) |
Werner LEMBERG <[hidden email]> writes:
>> So
>> \voiceOne \voiceTwo \voiceThree \voiceFour
>> becomes
>> \voiceUp \voiceDown \voiceUpTwo \voiceDownTwo
>
> I would make \voiceUp and \voiceDown be the same as \voiceUpOne and
> \voiceUpTwo, respectively, so that we can write
>
> \voiceUpOne \voiceDownOne \voiceUpTwo \voiceDownTwo
Here is another variant that's a bit bold:
\voice^1 \voice_1 \voice^2 \voice_2
This will syntactically take a fingering event as input. However, this
does not work as
\voices 1,2,-2,-1 << \\ ... \\ >>
does. I am not totally sure whether \voices ^1^2_1_2 << \\ ... \\ >>
might not be parseable (as a single post-event) but it won't mix with
symbolic names for voice contexts. So while it is a cute replacement
for \voiceOne ... and is expressive concerning its direction, I am not
sure it's a winner.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |