[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: openLilyLib

From: Urs Liska
Subject: Re: openLilyLib
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2016 00:29:05 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0

Am 17.11.2016 um 00:24 schrieb Noeck:
> ... I successfully used the edition-engraver writing:
> \include "edition-engraver/edition-engraver.ily"
> But I don't see the benefit of oll-core that way. 

Apart from the fact that this should be renamed to
"edition-engraver/package.ily" it's not *you* as a user that will see
the direct benefit. The benefit is that "edition-engraver" is now a
tangible unit (a repo) that can have an explicit maintainer, a dedicated
issue tracker and an individual list of people with push access.

(I pulled this mail because the other one takes substantially longer to
reply to)


> What am I supposed to do?
> Cheers,
> Joram
> _______________________________________________
> lilypond-user mailing list
> address@hidden

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]