[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Feedback wanted: syntax highlighting in the LilyPond documentation
From: |
Valentin Petzel |
Subject: |
Re: Feedback wanted: syntax highlighting in the LilyPond documentation |
Date: |
Tue, 04 Jan 2022 20:54:55 +0100 |
Hello Jean,
The code Aaron provided is quite nice, but I suggest to rather use a linked
stylesheet like
<link id="syntax-highlighting" href="no-highlighting.css" rel="stylesheet"
type="text/css" />
And then use JS like
document.getElementById("syntax-highlighting") = "highlighting1.css"
This results in less complicated JS and allows for multiple styles.
Cheers,
Valentin
Am Dienstag, 4. Jänner 2022, 20:32:50 CET schrieb Jean Abou Samra:
> > [Aaron]
>
> > It is fairly straightforward with CSS and a little JavaScript:
> Yeah, that is also what I was starting to muse with
> more seriously. Thanks for providing ready-made code.
>
> Forgive my igorance with the inner workings of the
> Internet: what does this mean in connection with GDPR
> and all that? Am I right that the fact that the
> information stored on the user's device serves
> a purpose essential to satisfying the very request
> of the user means that it would fall under PECR
> exceptions to the requirement of a banner asking
> for explicit consent of the user? Otherwise, as
> far as I can read, the requirement is that you
> must ask for permission before storing or using
> the data, so this permission could be asked
> to the reader just when toggling highlighting
> and not for everyone reading the documentation,
> right? I'm a bit at loss trying to understand
> what is OK or not in this respect.
>
> Other than that, well, there is still JavaScript.
> That's may not be the thing to be most happy about, but
> we could check how LibreJS handles that JavaScript,
> possibly adding stylized license comments, so that
> it would be no problem to those people refusing non-free
> JavaScript using LibreJS/IceCat. All in all this approach
> does look promising to me.
>
>
> [Wol]
>
> > Is that on the web page, or down to the reader?
>
> On the web page.
>
> Regards,
> Jean
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
- Re: Feedback wanted: syntax highlighting in the LilyPond documentation, (continued)
- Re: Feedback wanted: syntax highlighting in the LilyPond documentation, Erika Pirnes, 2022/01/04
- Re: Feedback wanted: syntax highlighting in the LilyPond documentation, Aaron Hill, 2022/01/04
- Re: Feedback wanted: syntax highlighting in the LilyPond documentation, Wols Lists, 2022/01/04
- Re: Feedback wanted: syntax highlighting in the LilyPond documentation, Valentin Petzel, 2022/01/04
- Re: Feedback wanted: syntax highlighting in the LilyPond documentation, Aaron Hill, 2022/01/04
- Re: Feedback wanted: syntax highlighting in the LilyPond documentation, Jean Abou Samra, 2022/01/04
- Re: Feedback wanted: syntax highlighting in the LilyPond documentation,
Valentin Petzel <=
- Re: Feedback wanted: syntax highlighting in the LilyPond documentation, Aaron Hill, 2022/01/04
- Re: Feedback wanted: syntax highlighting in the LilyPond documentation, Wol, 2022/01/04
- Re: Feedback wanted: syntax highlighting in the LilyPond documentation, Jean Abou Samra, 2022/01/04
- Re: Feedback wanted: syntax highlighting in the LilyPond documentation, Aaron Hill, 2022/01/04
- Re: Feedback wanted: syntax highlighting in the LilyPond documentation, Jean Abou Samra, 2022/01/04