[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Completion_heads_engraver for line-ends only?
From: |
Jean Abou Samra |
Subject: |
Re: Completion_heads_engraver for line-ends only? |
Date: |
Tue, 17 Jan 2023 20:38:50 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.6.0 |
Le 17/01/2023 à 20:33, Graham King a écrit :
I'm not really sure what best practice is here; it might be that these
collisions are just to be expected? (I can certainly live with them).
I don't have experience with this type of music, but my first question
would be: what is the alternative? If you were doing this with pen
and paper, how would you avoid those collisions? That's not clear to
me. You cannot really shorten all the beams, for some of them it would
look really bad ...
Best,
Jean
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
- Completion_heads_engraver for line-ends only?, Graham King, 2023/01/17
- Re: Completion_heads_engraver for line-ends only?, Jean Abou Samra, 2023/01/17
- Re: Completion_heads_engraver for line-ends only?, David Poon, 2023/01/17
- Re: Completion_heads_engraver for line-ends only?, Graham King, 2023/01/17
- Re: Completion_heads_engraver for line-ends only?,
Jean Abou Samra <=
- Re: Completion_heads_engraver for line-ends only?, Lukas-Fabian Moser, 2023/01/17
- Re: Completion_heads_engraver for line-ends only?, Graham King, 2023/01/17
- Re: Completion_heads_engraver for line-ends only?, Graham King, 2023/01/17
- Re: Completion_heads_engraver for line-ends only?, William Rehwinkel, 2023/01/17
- Re: Completion_heads_engraver for line-ends only?, Graham King, 2023/01/17
Re: Completion_heads_engraver for line-ends only?, Lukas-Fabian Moser, 2023/01/17
Re: Completion_heads_engraver for line-ends only?, Valentin Petzel, 2023/01/17
Re: Completion_heads_engraver for line-ends only?, Thomas Morley, 2023/01/18