[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [lwip-users] Re transmission behaviour?
From: |
Kieran Mansley |
Subject: |
Re: [lwip-users] Re transmission behaviour? |
Date: |
Mon, 02 Jul 2012 15:44:27 +0100 |
On Mon, 2012-07-02 at 15:41 +0100, Kieran Mansley wrote:
> Simon's right. The estimation of the RTO though may be (i) measured
> in
> slow timer ticks; and (ii) potentially much less than 1 slow timer
> tick.
> In these cases the stack will wait for exactly TCP_TMR_INTERVAL. In
> cases where the RTO is measured to be more than that it will wait
> longer.
Oops - Simon and I both meant RTT (round trip time) rather than RTO
retransmission time out) here I think. Sorry for any confusion.
Kieran
- Re: [lwip-users] Re transmission behaviour?, Fred39, 2012/07/02
- Re: [lwip-users] Re transmission behaviour?, Simon Goldschmidt, 2012/07/02
- Re: [lwip-users] Re transmission behaviour?, Fred39, 2012/07/02
- Re: [lwip-users] Re transmission behaviour?, Simon Goldschmidt, 2012/07/02
- Re: [lwip-users] Re transmission behaviour?, Pomeroy, Marty, 2012/07/02
- Re: [lwip-users] Re transmission behaviour?, Simon Goldschmidt, 2012/07/02
- Re: [lwip-users] Re transmission behaviour?, Kieran Mansley, 2012/07/02
- Re: [lwip-users] Re transmission behaviour?,
Kieran Mansley <=
- Re: [lwip-users] Re transmission behaviour?, Pomeroy, Marty, 2012/07/02
- Re: [lwip-users] Re transmission behaviour?, Simon Goldschmidt, 2012/07/02
- Re: [lwip-users] Re transmission behaviour?, Kieran Mansley, 2012/07/02
- Re: [lwip-users] Re transmission behaviour?, Fred39, 2012/07/03