[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: LYNX-DEV why not use shift-V to access multiple bookmarks list?
From: |
Filip M Gieszczykiewicz |
Subject: |
Re: LYNX-DEV why not use shift-V to access multiple bookmarks list? |
Date: |
Thu, 7 Nov 1996 08:44:25 -0600 (CST) |
You (gregory j. rosmaita) wrote:
> On Wed, 6 Nov 1996, Larry W. Virden, x2487 wrote "Re: LYNX-DEV Bookmarks -
> a better idea (?)":
> > One of the things that _I_ wish for is more lynx support of multiple curses
> > windows. We sort of have that now for scrolling lists on forms. Perhaps
> > the bookmarks could be implemented as 'popup' windows that go away once
> > one is finished.
>
> no, <em>no</em>, <strong><em>NO!</em></strong>
> pop up windows are extremely annoying to many speech-users and low-vision
> users of screen-magnification... one of the major requests of blind and
> vi individuals who ask me to reformat poorly encoded/designed forms is to
> get rid of the damn scrolling lists... therefore, when it comes to
> something as essential as multiple bookmarks it is essential that it be
> kept simple, plain, and painless...
> why not use shift-V? it has the advantage of already being identified
> with the bookmark file (as in go-to-bookmark)
> so why not define shift-V as go-to-list-of-bookmark-files?
Greetings. As far as I know - lynx don't care about case. Most items
in the switch () are of the form:
case 'A':
case 'a': blah...
So, both "V" and "Shift-V" bring it up. Do you want something different?
Take care.
P.S. BTW, I hate popups. If I want to use Netscape... I will. As
you said, lists in forms are already a pain.
;
; To UNSUBSCRIBE: Send a mail message to address@hidden
; with "unsubscribe lynx-dev" (without the
; quotation marks) on a line by itself.
;
- Re: LYNX-DEV why not use shift-V to access multiple bookmarks list?, (continued)
- Re: LYNX-DEV why not use shift-V to access multiple bookmarks list?, gregory j. rosmaita, 1996/11/08
- Re: LYNX-DEV why not use shift-V to access multiple bookmarks list?, Larry W. Virden, x2487, 1996/11/08
- Re: LYNX-DEV why not use shift-V to access multiple bookmarks list?, Al Gilman, 1996/11/08
- Re: LYNX-DEV why not use shift-V to access multiple bookmarks list?, Benjamin C. W. Sittler, 1996/11/08
- Re: LYNX-DEV why not use shift-V to access multiple bookmarks list?, Al Gilman, 1996/11/08
- LYNX-DEV trickle-down development?, gregory j. rosmaita, 1996/11/08
- Re: LYNX-DEV why not use shift-V to access multiple bookmarks list?, Walter Skorski, 1996/11/07
- Re: LYNX-DEV why not use shift-V to access multiple bookmarks list?,
Filip M Gieszczykiewicz <=
- Re: LYNX-DEV why not use shift-V to access multiple bookmarks list?, gregory j. rosmaita, 1996/11/07
- Re: LYNX-DEV why not use shift-V to access multiple bookmarks list?, Filip M Gieszczykiewicz, 1996/11/07
- Re: LYNX-DEV Bookmarks - a better idea (?), Walter Skorski, 1996/11/06
- Re: LYNX-DEV Bookmarks - a better idea (?), Walter Skorski, 1996/11/06
- Re: LYNX-DEV Bookmarks - a better idea (?), Filip M Gieszczykiewicz, 1996/11/07
- Re: LYNX-DEV Bookmarks - a better idea (?), Steve Holmes, 1996/11/11
- Re: LYNX-DEV Bookmarks - a better idea (?), Filip M Gieszczykiewicz, 1996/11/11
Re: LYNX-DEV Re: Multibookmark patch, Bela Lubkin, 1996/11/03
Re: LYNX-DEV Re: Multibookmark patch, Bela Lubkin, 1996/11/04